<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Spring 2007 MATLAB Contest Starts Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.mathworks.com/contest/2007/05/09/the-spring-2007-matlab-contest-starts-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/contest/2007/05/09/the-spring-2007-matlab-contest-starts-today/</link>
	<description>The MATLAB Programming Contest is a semi-annual competition where contestants submit MATLAB code to try to solve a challenge.  For more information, see http://www.mathworks.com/contest/overview.html</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:45:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/contest/2007/05/09/the-spring-2007-matlab-contest-starts-today/#comment-2106</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 20:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/contest/?p=61#comment-2106</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Nick.  I added this to the wording.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Nick.  I added this to the wording.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Howe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/contest/2007/05/09/the-spring-2007-matlab-contest-starts-today/#comment-2105</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Howe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 13:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/contest/?p=61#comment-2105</guid>
		<description>As far as I am concerned this goes without saying, but you might also want to explicitly prohibit extraction of *answers* to the test suite puzzles.  (In Blackbox, the puzzle and answer were the same.  But in the Peg contest, one could compute an optimum set of moves and try to pass those back for future use, while claiming innocence to the charge of extracting the *puzzles*.  It still amounts to cheating in my mind, but a literalist might claim a difference.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I am concerned this goes without saying, but you might also want to explicitly prohibit extraction of *answers* to the test suite puzzles.  (In Blackbox, the puzzle and answer were the same.  But in the Peg contest, one could compute an optimum set of moves and try to pass those back for future use, while claiming innocence to the charge of extracting the *puzzles*.  It still amounts to cheating in my mind, but a literalist might claim a difference.  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

