<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mike on the MATLAB Desktop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop</link>
	<description>Mike works on the MATLAB Desktop team</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:24:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scoring in Cody by sean</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/2012/02/06/scoring-in-cody/#comment-8486</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/?p=623#comment-8486</guid>
		<description>I amused myself for a few minutes doing this, but am a little frustrated by the policy of hiding the best scoring solution. How am I going to learn something new with that policy in place? If I knew a better solution, I would do it... Cody isn&#039;t as valuable as it could be. It was almost a good idea to allow people to learn from others (possibly better) code. But no... Weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I amused myself for a few minutes doing this, but am a little frustrated by the policy of hiding the best scoring solution. How am I going to learn something new with that policy in place? If I knew a better solution, I would do it&#8230; Cody isn&#8217;t as valuable as it could be. It was almost a good idea to allow people to learn from others (possibly better) code. But no&#8230; Weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Calling Java from MATLAB, Memory Issues by Joseph Fitzgerald</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/2009/08/17/calling-java-from-matlab-memory-issues/#comment-8481</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Fitzgerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/2009/08/17/calling-java-from-matlab-memory-issues/#comment-8481</guid>
		<description>When I call a Java method from Matlab, is the memory copied to the Java heap?  And then when I return data from Java to Matlab is that data copied to the Matlab heap?  If so, is this a big performance concern that I should try to optimize (reduce the passing of data between heaps)?  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I call a Java method from Matlab, is the memory copied to the Java heap?  And then when I return data from Java to Matlab is that data copied to the Matlab heap?  If so, is this a big performance concern that I should try to optimize (reduce the passing of data between heaps)?  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MATLAB-Emacs integration is back by Codre</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/2009/09/14/matlab-emacs-integration-is-back/#comment-8480</link>
		<dc:creator>Codre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/2009/09/14/matlab-emacs-integration-is-back/#comment-8480</guid>
		<description>Hello,
I use emacs at about 180 chars width.
When using matlab-shell mode I can define a string variable &quot;foo&quot; up to that width s.t. 
matlab&gt; foo
returns the full string unwrapped.

However,when I query a vector or matrix &quot;test&quot;
matlab&gt;test
matlab wraps the display at column 70

That seemed like a good clue and it suggested this was  more of a matlab inside emacs problem than an emacs problem, but I haven&#039;t figured out how to configure emacs to understand the terminal width when it&#039;s running inside emacs..
I&#039;ve tried 
things like 
 (defcustom matlab-fill-fudge-hard-maximum 150
inside of matlab.el 
without success.

Can anyone help ?

Thx,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
I use emacs at about 180 chars width.<br />
When using matlab-shell mode I can define a string variable &#8220;foo&#8221; up to that width s.t.<br />
matlab&gt; foo<br />
returns the full string unwrapped.</p>
<p>However,when I query a vector or matrix &#8220;test&#8221;<br />
matlab&gt;test<br />
matlab wraps the display at column 70</p>
<p>That seemed like a good clue and it suggested this was  more of a matlab inside emacs problem than an emacs problem, but I haven&#8217;t figured out how to configure emacs to understand the terminal width when it&#8217;s running inside emacs..<br />
I&#8217;ve tried<br />
things like<br />
 (defcustom matlab-fill-fudge-hard-maximum 150<br />
inside of matlab.el<br />
without success.</p>
<p>Can anyone help ?</p>
<p>Thx,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scoring in Cody by Amy Cutting</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/2012/02/06/scoring-in-cody/#comment-8478</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Cutting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/?p=623#comment-8478</guid>
		<description>I like Cody, and since it doesn&#039;t penalize for comments and descriptive variable names, I think it&#039;s a good way to score. A second score for execution time would also be nice to see. 

I am also interested in a Simulink Cody, although I understand that it would be much more labor intensive to create such a thing. I have several scripts written in Matlab that I cannot find a way to execute in Simulink (or embedded Matlab), so anything to help hone my Simulink skills is appreciated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Cody, and since it doesn&#8217;t penalize for comments and descriptive variable names, I think it&#8217;s a good way to score. A second score for execution time would also be nice to see. </p>
<p>I am also interested in a Simulink Cody, although I understand that it would be much more labor intensive to create such a thing. I have several scripts written in Matlab that I cannot find a way to execute in Simulink (or embedded Matlab), so anything to help hone my Simulink skills is appreciated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scoring in Cody by Ned Gulley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/2012/02/06/scoring-in-cody/#comment-8476</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned Gulley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/?p=623#comment-8476</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a fair point. One of the things we&#039;ve tried to do is make it easy to update the test suite on the fly, so when you see a weak test suite, please leave a comment and hopefully the author will come back and strengthen the tests. I know I&#039;ve done this several times. With a rich enough test suite, any hard-coded answer is certain to be longer than a proper answer. Anyone who still enjoys making look-up tables after that has a strange hobby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a fair point. One of the things we&#8217;ve tried to do is make it easy to update the test suite on the fly, so when you see a weak test suite, please leave a comment and hopefully the author will come back and strengthen the tests. I know I&#8217;ve done this several times. With a rich enough test suite, any hard-coded answer is certain to be longer than a proper answer. Anyone who still enjoys making look-up tables after that has a strange hobby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scoring in Cody by David Young</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/2012/02/06/scoring-in-cody/#comment-8475</link>
		<dc:creator>David Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/?p=623#comment-8475</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had some fun with Cody and I think it&#039;s interesting - and I&#039;ve learnt some things from others people&#039;s solutions. I can see that the scoring system is a reasonable compromise, and although it can get a bit silly if you go for the absolute minimum size (&#039;011&#039;-&#039;0&#039; instead of [0 1 1] for example), on the whole it&#039;s good to push towards concise code. It encourages you to explore the full capabilities of different functions, which can be worthwhile.

One suggestion: I&#039;d like to see richer test sets. Some of them are a bit minimal, and some solvers produce answers which are simply lookup tables to get the test cases right. I can&#039;t see the point of doing this, but it&#039;s disappointing when you look at what should be a really neat answer and it&#039;s actually just a few if-else clauses. In some cases, where there&#039;s a reference solution, you could have dynamically generated test data, but even without this you could vary things more - for example there are only 4x4 boards as tests in the Conway&#039;s game of life problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had some fun with Cody and I think it&#8217;s interesting &#8211; and I&#8217;ve learnt some things from others people&#8217;s solutions. I can see that the scoring system is a reasonable compromise, and although it can get a bit silly if you go for the absolute minimum size (&#8217;011&#8242;-&#8217;0&#8242; instead of [0 1 1] for example), on the whole it&#8217;s good to push towards concise code. It encourages you to explore the full capabilities of different functions, which can be worthwhile.</p>
<p>One suggestion: I&#8217;d like to see richer test sets. Some of them are a bit minimal, and some solvers produce answers which are simply lookup tables to get the test cases right. I can&#8217;t see the point of doing this, but it&#8217;s disappointing when you look at what should be a really neat answer and it&#8217;s actually just a few if-else clauses. In some cases, where there&#8217;s a reference solution, you could have dynamically generated test data, but even without this you could vary things more &#8211; for example there are only 4&#215;4 boards as tests in the Conway&#8217;s game of life problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scoring in Cody by Ned Gulley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/2012/02/06/scoring-in-cody/#comment-8474</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned Gulley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/?p=623#comment-8474</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t expect Simulink Cody anytime soon, but it&#039;s certainly possible if there&#039;s enough interest. Anybody else interested?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t expect Simulink Cody anytime soon, but it&#8217;s certainly possible if there&#8217;s enough interest. Anybody else interested?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scoring in Cody by Michael Joslin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/2012/02/06/scoring-in-cody/#comment-8473</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Joslin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/?p=623#comment-8473</guid>
		<description>I really like cody. I don&#039;t know how plausible this is but would it be possible to make a similar game for simulink?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like cody. I don&#8217;t know how plausible this is but would it be possible to make a similar game for simulink?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Calling Java from MATLAB by Michael Katz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/2009/07/06/calling-java-from-matlab/#comment-8470</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Katz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/2009/07/06/calling-java-from-matlab/#comment-8470</guid>
		<description>@Ullas,
 I&#039;m afraid that I&#039;m not familiar with the Lookup class. Please contact technical support for more detailed assitance.

@Ritu,
 You need to make sure that class (or it&#039;s jar) is on MATLAB&#039;s java path. See the documentation: &lt;a href=&quot;www.mathworks.com/help/techdoc/ref/javaaddpath.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.mathworks.com/help/techdoc/ref/javaaddpath.html&lt;/a&gt;. If you need further assistance, contact Technical support and they can walk you through it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ullas,<br />
 I&#8217;m afraid that I&#8217;m not familiar with the Lookup class. Please contact technical support for more detailed assitance.</p>
<p>@Ritu,<br />
 You need to make sure that class (or it&#8217;s jar) is on MATLAB&#8217;s java path. See the documentation: <a href="www.mathworks.com/help/techdoc/ref/javaaddpath.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mathworks.com/help/techdoc/ref/javaaddpath.html</a>. If you need further assistance, contact Technical support and they can walk you through it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scoring in Cody by JeanYves</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/2012/02/06/scoring-in-cody/#comment-8468</link>
		<dc:creator>JeanYves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/?p=623#comment-8468</guid>
		<description>Fantastic news! Can&#039;t wait to see it!

You can have zillion of constraint ideas. Like

  every line shorter than 10 characters
  maximum of 3 pairs of brackets (limit number of function calls)
  digits forbidden 
 ...

Good luck, and again: fantastic game! I am learning so much doing it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic news! Can&#8217;t wait to see it!</p>
<p>You can have zillion of constraint ideas. Like</p>
<p>  every line shorter than 10 characters<br />
  maximum of 3 pairs of brackets (limit number of function calls)<br />
  digits forbidden<br />
 &#8230;</p>
<p>Good luck, and again: fantastic game! I am learning so much doing it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

