<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stopwatch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.mathworks.com/pick/2008/08/22/stopwatch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/pick/2008/08/22/stopwatch/</link>
	<description>&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/loadAuthor.do?objectId=1093599&#38;objectType=author&#34;&#62;Brett&#60;/a&#62; &#38; &#60;a href=&#34;http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/loadAuthor.do?objectId=1094142&#38;objectType=author&#34;&#62;Jiro&#60;/a&#62; share favorite user-contributed submissions from the File Exchange.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:26:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/pick/2008/08/22/stopwatch/#comment-12841</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/pick/2008/08/22/stopwatch/#comment-12841</guid>
		<description>Regarding the code metrics:

1. I think the cyclomatic complexity does not tell anything about how good and useful an entry is.

2. The code metrics are still often displayed wrong. Check out this example:

Here is seems that four of the five metrics are very low:

http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/loadFile.do?objectId=18593&amp;objectType=file

However, in three of those four categories, the submisson gets the best values possible (0.0 M-Lint messages, 0.0 filename clashes and 0.0 cloned code):

http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/loadFile.do?objectId=18593&amp;objectType=scoreDetails

Maybe one could check the computation of the green bar visualization.

Yours
Markus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the code metrics:</p>
<p>1. I think the cyclomatic complexity does not tell anything about how good and useful an entry is.</p>
<p>2. The code metrics are still often displayed wrong. Check out this example:</p>
<p>Here is seems that four of the five metrics are very low:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/loadFile.do?objectId=18593&#038;objectType=file" rel="nofollow">http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/loadFile.do?objectId=18593&#038;objectType=file</a></p>
<p>However, in three of those four categories, the submisson gets the best values possible (0.0 M-Lint messages, 0.0 filename clashes and 0.0 cloned code):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/loadFile.do?objectId=18593&#038;objectType=scoreDetails" rel="nofollow">http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/loadFile.do?objectId=18593&#038;objectType=scoreDetails</a></p>
<p>Maybe one could check the computation of the green bar visualization.</p>
<p>Yours<br />
Markus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

