Comments on: Tips on how to use Simulink more efficiently http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/ This blog is about Simulink. Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:41:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Han Geerligs http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/#comment-1559 Han Geerligs Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:09:56 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/#comment-1559 Hi Simon, thanks for the prompt answer. I am happy MathWorks is working on the editors. I think it will be very beneficial to "unify" the Stateflow and Simulink diagram editors. -Han Hi Simon,

thanks for the prompt answer. I am happy MathWorks is working on the editors. I think it will be very beneficial to “unify” the Stateflow and Simulink diagram editors.

-Han

]]> By: Simon Greenwold http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/#comment-1557 Simon Greenwold Thu, 08 Sep 2011 01:25:20 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/#comment-1557 Hi Han. As part of the major ongoing effort to revamp the Simulink and Stateflow editors, panning and zooming controls have undergone quite a transformation. Your suggestion is right in line with what we are planning. In fact, by default the scroll wheel will zoom instead of scroll. It is, however, controlled by a preference which will allow you to do exactly what you describe. This work is tied to a larger effort that is not going to be available in R2012a. Hi Han. As part of the major ongoing effort to revamp the Simulink and Stateflow editors, panning and zooming controls have undergone quite a transformation. Your suggestion is right in line with what we are planning. In fact, by default the scroll wheel will zoom instead of scroll. It is, however, controlled by a preference which will allow you to do exactly what you describe.

This work is tied to a larger effort that is not going to be available in R2012a.

]]> By: Han Geerligs http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/#comment-1556 Han Geerligs Tue, 06 Sep 2011 06:37:14 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/#comment-1556 Hi Seth (and also Guy), I was wondering what has happened with my suggestion to use ctrl-scroll for zooming in/out? Is it being considered to appear in the next release r2012a? --Han Hi Seth (and also Guy),

I was wondering what has happened with my suggestion to use ctrl-scroll for zooming in/out?

Is it being considered to appear in the next release r2012a?

–Han

]]> By: Amirthalingam http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/#comment-1286 Amirthalingam Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:54:47 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/#comment-1286 Hi, It will be great to have an automatic clean-up / Arrange elements tool like in Labview. While updating the model everytime, we are making the model messy... we are facing problems like...More crossing lines / signals... The elements are not in order... Even the model works, the reviewer is having hard time due to this. So it is great to have a button, clicking it shall arrange all the elements in order and reduces the crossing lines / signals by moving the elements inteligently.. It will be more good if the button allows us to apply this only to selected portion of the model... Hi, It will be great to have an automatic clean-up / Arrange elements tool like in Labview. While updating the model everytime, we are making the model messy… we are facing problems like…More crossing lines / signals… The elements are not in order…

Even the model works, the reviewer is having hard time due to this. So it is great to have a button, clicking it shall arrange all the elements in order and reduces the crossing lines / signals by moving the elements inteligently.. It will be more good if the button allows us to apply this only to selected portion of the model…

]]> By: Sunny R Billava http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/#comment-1199 Sunny R Billava Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:55:57 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/#comment-1199 Sir, Is there a way to Disable/Hide the close button ('X') of the Simulink model window? Regards, Sunny Sir,

Is there a way to Disable/Hide the close button (‘X’) of the Simulink model window?

Regards,
Sunny

]]> By: esayas http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/#comment-964 esayas Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:08:10 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/#comment-964 nice work ! nice work !

]]> By: pooja http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/#comment-935 pooja Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:47:17 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/#comment-935 sir i wanted to know the block diagram of bernoulli map using simulink...... sir i wanted to know the block diagram of bernoulli map using simulink……

]]> By: vinod naik http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/#comment-808 vinod naik Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:14:57 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/#comment-808 Good morning all, i have this model which has a)bernoulli binary generator b)TCM-MPSK encoder c)buffer d)Matrix interleaver e)multipath fading channel and AWGN channel f)Deinterleaver and BUffer g)TCM-MPSK decoder h)Error rate calculation i)simout i want to plot the ber for the above model with interleaving,my problem is that my input signal width is 10000x1. we know that matrix interleaver dimensions product should be equal to 10000. but i want to use buffers. can you tell me how can we do this? very urgent because i have to submit my thesis within a week. Good morning all,
i have this model which has
a)bernoulli binary generator
b)TCM-MPSK encoder
c)buffer
d)Matrix interleaver
e)multipath fading channel and AWGN channel
f)Deinterleaver and BUffer
g)TCM-MPSK decoder
h)Error rate calculation
i)simout

i want to plot the ber for the above model with interleaving,my problem is that my input signal width is 10000×1. we know that matrix interleaver dimensions product should be equal to 10000. but i want to use buffers. can you tell me how can we do this? very urgent because i have to submit my thesis within a week.

]]> By: vinod naik http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/#comment-807 vinod naik Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:04:37 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/#comment-807 can i know your personal email id Mr.Seth can i know your personal email id Mr.Seth

]]> By: Ali http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/#comment-692 Ali Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:18:41 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/05/30/tips-on-how-to-use-simulink-more-efficiently/#comment-692 Hello, I am having the age old problem of port synchronization in Simulink. I have created a simulink model to simulate error correction by Hamming codes but even with out any channel noise, I am getting error. Would you like to try it out and find a possible solution I have the simulink model uploaded at edaboard.com (http:// www.edaboard.com/viewtopic.php?t=341926&highlight=) since I dont know how to upload it here. But you can contact me via my email address, I'll send you the model. But please help me as it is really holding me back in terms of Simulation and the use of Simulink for that matter So have you found a better way to solve it. I tried the buffer thing. I used a buffer prior to Hamming code to make the length equal to 4 bits and fed it to Hamming encoder. After Hamming encoder the output is 7 bits. Now since I want to use interleaver 7 bits are not enough so I used another buffer to concatenate it till 200 bits. The problem is that I can't decode it after de-interleaving. I always get an error even without any noise. I know this problem is due to "Alignment" and "Delays" but honestly speaking I dont find Simulink tutorial in Matlab help too helpful. I hope you have solved the problem and are willing to share the solution. Please share this solution. I'm expecting a quick reply Hello, I am having the age old problem of port synchronization in
Simulink. I have created a simulink model to simulate error correction
by Hamming codes but even with out any channel noise, I am getting
error. Would you like to try it out and find a possible solution

I have the simulink model uploaded at edaboard.com (http://
http://www.edaboard.com/viewtopic.php?t=341926&highlight=) since I dont know how to upload it here. But you can contact me via my email address, I’ll send you the model. But please help me as it is really holding me back in terms of Simulation and the use of Simulink for that matter

So have you found a better way to solve it. I tried the buffer thing. I used a buffer prior to Hamming code to make the length equal to 4 bits and fed it to Hamming encoder. After Hamming encoder the output is 7 bits. Now since I want to use interleaver 7 bits are not enough so I used another buffer to concatenate it till 200 bits. The problem is that I can’t decode it after de-interleaving. I always get an error even without any noise.

I know this problem is due to “Alignment” and “Delays” but honestly speaking I dont find Simulink tutorial in Matlab help too helpful. I hope you have solved the problem and are willing to share the solution.

Please share this solution. I’m expecting a quick reply

]]>