Comments on: R2008b: Simulink! http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/07/22/r2008b-simulink/ This blog is about Simulink. Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:30:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 By: Seth http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/07/22/r2008b-simulink/#comment-457 Seth Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:53:47 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/07/22/r2008b-simulink/#comment-457 @Dan - The new object system can be used as part of M-file S-functions, as well as model callbacks. There is currently no mechanism to derive a class from blocks as you describe. Thanks for your suggestion! @Dan - The new object system can be used as part of M-file S-functions, as well as model callbacks. There is currently no mechanism to derive a class from blocks as you describe. Thanks for your suggestion!

]]> By: Dan http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/07/22/r2008b-simulink/#comment-445 Dan Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:50:46 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/07/22/r2008b-simulink/#comment-445 I'd like to thank all of you for implementing a new object model. The old one was less than user friendly. Can the new objects be used with Simulink? More specifically, is there a way to derive a class from a parent block class and just overload callbacks instead of going about the standard S-function method? This would be incredibly useful. I’d like to thank all of you for implementing a new object model. The old one was less than user friendly.

Can the new objects be used with Simulink? More specifically, is there a way to derive a class from a parent block class and just overload callbacks instead of going about the standard S-function method? This would be incredibly useful.

]]>