<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Challenge: Metronome and Cart Equations of Motion</title>
	<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/10/09/challenge-metronome-and-cart-equations-of-motion/</link>
	<description>This blog is about Simulink.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Steffen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/10/09/challenge-metronome-and-cart-equations-of-motion/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Steffen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/10/09/challenge-metronome-and-cart-equations-of-motion/#comment-575</guid>
		<description>I have uploaded a file, but it will take a while to appear. I think the synchronisation will not work with a purely linear model, because that will produce several resonance frequencies. I modelled the driving force of the metronome, and that did the trick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have uploaded a file, but it will take a while to appear. I think the synchronisation will not work with a purely linear model, because that will produce several resonance frequencies. I modelled the driving force of the metronome, and that did the trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/10/09/challenge-metronome-and-cart-equations-of-motion/#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/10/09/challenge-metronome-and-cart-equations-of-motion/#comment-572</guid>
		<description>@ABindermann - you are right... I should flip the metronome scope.  Is this an appropriate mechanical model for a metronome?  I have played around with a version using an inverted representation and a spring to stabilize it, and I didn't see much difference in the behavior.  The other experiment I tried was adding friction to the metronome and an energy reserve to kick the pendulum back.  I found all of this made things more complicated without much benefit.

This is the metronome I was thinking about as I approached the problem:

&lt;img src="http://blogs.mathworks.com/images/seth/2008Q4/metronomePendulum.png"/&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ABindermann - you are right&#8230; I should flip the metronome scope.  Is this an appropriate mechanical model for a metronome?  I have played around with a version using an inverted representation and a spring to stabilize it, and I didn&#8217;t see much difference in the behavior.  The other experiment I tried was adding friction to the metronome and an energy reserve to kick the pendulum back.  I found all of this made things more complicated without much benefit.</p>
<p>This is the metronome I was thinking about as I approached the problem:</p>
<p><img src="http://blogs.mathworks.com/images/seth/2008Q4/metronomePendulum.png"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABindemann</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/10/09/challenge-metronome-and-cart-equations-of-motion/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>ABindemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.mathworks.com/seth/2008/10/09/challenge-metronome-and-cart-equations-of-motion/#comment-571</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, is a simple pendulum an appropriate mechanical model for a metronome?  What you've modeled is a vertically hanging, gravity stabilized pendulum rather than a spring stabilized inverted pendulum.  Based on your approach you should "flipud" your metronome scope ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, is a simple pendulum an appropriate mechanical model for a metronome?  What you&#8217;ve modeled is a vertically hanging, gravity stabilized pendulum rather than a spring stabilized inverted pendulum.  Based on your approach you should &#8220;flipud&#8221; your metronome scope ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
