<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Resetting my expectations: What do users know about new product features?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2006/02/16/resetting-my-expectations-what-do-users-know-about-new-product-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2006/02/16/resetting-my-expectations-what-do-users-know-about-new-product-features/</link>
	<description>Steve Eddins manages the Image &#38; Geospatial development team at The MathWorks and coauthored Digital Image Processing Using MATLAB. He writes here about image processing concepts, algorithm implementations, and MATLAB.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:27:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2006/02/16/resetting-my-expectations-what-do-users-know-about-new-product-features/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/?p=43#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Jani - I assume you are asking how to multiply an integer array by some floating-point scalar.  In MATLAB 7, this works fine; you don&#039;t need to convert to double first.  In earlier versions, use the Image Processing Toolbox function immultiply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jani &#8211; I assume you are asking how to multiply an integer array by some floating-point scalar.  In MATLAB 7, this works fine; you don&#8217;t need to convert to double first.  In earlier versions, use the Image Processing Toolbox function immultiply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jani</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2006/02/16/resetting-my-expectations-what-do-users-know-about-new-product-features/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>jani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 06:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/?p=43#comment-75</guid>
		<description>please tell me how to do multiplication in image processing without using im2double conversion ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please tell me how to do multiplication in image processing without using im2double conversion ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2006/02/16/resetting-my-expectations-what-do-users-know-about-new-product-features/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/?p=43#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Greg - imtransform can handle many types of spatial transformations.  However, it&#039;s meant for transforming from one Cartesian grid to another.  If you have image samples in polar coordinates and want to create an image on a Cartesian grid, I suggest you look at griddata.

If these first few blogs are successful, then I predict there will be more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg &#8211; imtransform can handle many types of spatial transformations.  However, it&#8217;s meant for transforming from one Cartesian grid to another.  If you have image samples in polar coordinates and want to create an image on a Cartesian grid, I suggest you look at griddata.</p>
<p>If these first few blogs are successful, then I predict there will be more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2006/02/16/resetting-my-expectations-what-do-users-know-about-new-product-features/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/?p=43#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve,
  I&#039;m another of those who didn&#039;t follow the tform introduction.  However, I&#039;m casting around in the documentation now because I&#039;d like to do polar and back to cartesian transformations of images.  Is there something that will do non-affine transforms?  Any pointers?  Google is letting me down...

Cheers,
greg

PS more blogs from TMW would be great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve,<br />
  I&#8217;m another of those who didn&#8217;t follow the tform introduction.  However, I&#8217;m casting around in the documentation now because I&#8217;d like to do polar and back to cartesian transformations of images.  Is there something that will do non-affine transforms?  Any pointers?  Google is letting me down&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
greg</p>
<p>PS more blogs from TMW would be great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2006/02/16/resetting-my-expectations-what-do-users-know-about-new-product-features/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/?p=43#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve

I am one of those people who wasn&#039;t aware of the tform functionality, despite having used the image processing toolbox for the last year and a half for some of my PhD work.   

I suppose it&#039;s because most of the time the transformations I work with are at worst projective, so I only ever need to use constant matrices (and their inverses). Because I tend to work with points extracted from images, rather than images themselves, points are easily transformed by simple matrix multiplication. However, from reading the documentation, imtransform looks like a very useful function!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve</p>
<p>I am one of those people who wasn&#8217;t aware of the tform functionality, despite having used the image processing toolbox for the last year and a half for some of my PhD work.   </p>
<p>I suppose it&#8217;s because most of the time the transformations I work with are at worst projective, so I only ever need to use constant matrices (and their inverses). Because I tend to work with points extracted from images, rather than images themselves, points are easily transformed by simple matrix multiplication. However, from reading the documentation, imtransform looks like a very useful function!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

