<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Upslope area - Plateau processing</title>
	<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/06/08/upslope-area-part-5/</link>
	<description>Steve Eddins manages the Image &#38; Geospatial development team at &#60;a href="http://www.mathworks.com/"&#62;The MathWorks&#60;/a&#62; and coauthored &#60;a href="http://www.mathworks.com/support/books/book5291.html?category=-1&#38;language=-1"&#62;Digital Image Processing Using MATLAB&#60;/a&#62;. He writes here about image processing concepts, algorithm implementations, and MATLAB.&#60;br&#62;&#60;br&#62;&#60;img&#62;</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/06/08/upslope-area-part-5/#comment-20896</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/06/08/upslope-area-part-5/#comment-20896</guid>
		<description>Felix&#8212;I'm glad to hear the code is working for you.  I was also glad to get your comment, because it reminded me to put a note at the top to caution readers that I eventually implemented a different method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Felix&mdash;I&#8217;m glad to hear the code is working for you.  I was also glad to get your comment, because it reminded me to put a note at the top to caution readers that I eventually implemented a different method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/06/08/upslope-area-part-5/#comment-20893</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/06/08/upslope-area-part-5/#comment-20893</guid>
		<description>Yes, sorry, I didnt find the rest of the blog entries before I read this... that's what you get for smart assing around ;-)
Found your tools now and your flow direction script works a treat! Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, sorry, I didnt find the rest of the blog entries before I read this&#8230; that&#8217;s what you get for smart assing around ;-)<br />
Found your tools now and your flow direction script works a treat! Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/06/08/upslope-area-part-5/#comment-20889</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/06/08/upslope-area-part-5/#comment-20889</guid>
		<description>Felix&#8212;P.S. I added a note to the top of this post to refer readers to the later one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Felix&mdash;P.S. I added a note to the top of this post to refer readers to the later one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/06/08/upslope-area-part-5/#comment-20888</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/06/08/upslope-area-part-5/#comment-20888</guid>
		<description>Felix&#8212;I discovered this problem after I originally wrote the post above, and I revisited plateau handling later.  See &lt;a href="http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/08/23/upslope-area-handling-plateaus-revisited/" rel="nofollow"&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt; for details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Felix&mdash;I discovered this problem after I originally wrote the post above, and I revisited plateau handling later.  See <a href="http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/08/23/upslope-area-handling-plateaus-revisited/" rel="nofollow">this post</a> for details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/06/08/upslope-area-part-5/#comment-20887</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/06/08/upslope-area-part-5/#comment-20887</guid>
		<description>The example
a =
   120   118   123
   120   118   125
   119   119   126
being filled using roifill to give
b =
  120.0000  118.0000  123.0000
  120.0000  120.5000  125.0000
  119.0000  119.0000  126.0000
is hydrologically not sensible, as it introduced a local watershed at the center pixel. While in a, the water would be most likely to leave the 3x3 area through the 1,2 pixel, in b there are two pour points 1,2 and 3,2, so you wouldn't want that. Instead you would want to assign a flow direction of the nearest pixel with the same elevation.
For sinks (local minima) you would fill the sink to the minimum neighbouring elevation and assign it its flow direction. This way you make sure you dont change any hydrological properties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The example<br />
a =<br />
   120   118   123<br />
   120   118   125<br />
   119   119   126<br />
being filled using roifill to give<br />
b =<br />
  120.0000  118.0000  123.0000<br />
  120.0000  120.5000  125.0000<br />
  119.0000  119.0000  126.0000<br />
is hydrologically not sensible, as it introduced a local watershed at the center pixel. While in a, the water would be most likely to leave the 3&#215;3 area through the 1,2 pixel, in b there are two pour points 1,2 and 3,2, so you wouldn&#8217;t want that. Instead you would want to assign a flow direction of the nearest pixel with the same elevation.<br />
For sinks (local minima) you would fill the sink to the minimum neighbouring elevation and assign it its flow direction. This way you make sure you dont change any hydrological properties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
