<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Connected component labeling &#8211; Wrapping up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/06/13/connected-component-labeling-wrapping-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/06/13/connected-component-labeling-wrapping-up/</link>
	<description>Steve Eddins manages the Image &#38; Geospatial development team at The MathWorks and coauthored Digital Image Processing Using MATLAB. He writes here about image processing concepts, algorithm implementations, and MATLAB.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:55:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/06/13/connected-component-labeling-wrapping-up/#comment-20209</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/06/13/connected-component-labeling-wrapping-up/#comment-20209</guid>
		<description>Ram&#8212;Use &lt;tt&gt;bwlabeln&lt;/tt&gt;, which allows custom connectivity matrix.  However, your example is not a valid connectivity matrix.  The Image Processing Toolbox connectivity definitions do not allow you to say that a pixel is directly adjacent to another pixel that&#039;s two steps away, which is what your matrix implies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ram&mdash;Use <tt>bwlabeln</tt>, which allows custom connectivity matrix.  However, your example is not a valid connectivity matrix.  The Image Processing Toolbox connectivity definitions do not allow you to say that a pixel is directly adjacent to another pixel that&#8217;s two steps away, which is what your matrix implies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ram</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/06/13/connected-component-labeling-wrapping-up/#comment-20204</link>
		<dc:creator>Ram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 05:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/06/13/connected-component-labeling-wrapping-up/#comment-20204</guid>
		<description>hi steve,

Is there a way of establishing custom connectivity
such as conn=[00100;
              01110;
              11111;
              01110;
              00100];?
If i am not wrong bwlabel allows only scalars 4 and 8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi steve,</p>
<p>Is there a way of establishing custom connectivity<br />
such as conn=[00100;<br />
              01110;<br />
              11111;<br />
              01110;<br />
              00100];?<br />
If i am not wrong bwlabel allows only scalars 4 and 8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

