Comments on: Image processing in the movies http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/ Steve Eddins manages the Image & Geospatial development team at The MathWorks and coauthored Digital Image Processing Using MATLAB. He writes here about image processing concepts, algorithm implementations, and MATLAB. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:27:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Michelle http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/#comment-24241 Michelle Thu, 26 May 2011 18:12:33 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/#comment-24241 Bryan, thanks for posting the quote! I couldn't find it on IMDb and yours is the top internet search result for that quote - (congrats!) That is easily my favorite movie math line ever. The classics don't go out of style! :) I think I'll work it into a conversation today and see if anyone picks up on it ... lol - at least I will amuse myself :) Bryan, thanks for posting the quote! I couldn’t find it on IMDb and yours is the top internet search result for that quote – (congrats!)
That is easily my favorite movie math line ever. The classics don’t go out of style! :)

I think I’ll work it into a conversation today and see if anyone picks up on it … lol – at least I will amuse myself :)

]]> By: Bryan http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/#comment-22559 Bryan Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:27:27 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/#comment-22559 In responce to the quote from "No Way Out" I believe the correct line is: "Ya got the wrong eigenvalue!! Put a Fourier transform on it. PRONTO!!" Of course it makes no sense but I love that quote and still say it sometimes. In responce to the quote from “No Way Out” I believe the correct line is:

“Ya got the wrong eigenvalue!! Put a Fourier transform on it. PRONTO!!”

Of course it makes no sense but I love that quote and still say it sometimes.

]]> By: Matteo http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/#comment-22523 Matteo Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:31:53 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/#comment-22523 Rising sun had a number of cool tricks. 2 generations ahead in Japan. The book is even better as it has references. Bless Michael Chricton Rising sun had a number of cool tricks. 2 generations ahead in Japan. The book is even better as it has references. Bless Michael Chricton

]]> By: Steve http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/#comment-18469 Steve Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:42:18 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/#comment-18469 Sokol—I'm sorry, but your question is way outside my area of expertise. Sokol—I’m sorry, but your question is way outside my area of expertise.

]]> By: Sokol http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/#comment-18468 Sokol Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:32:09 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/#comment-18468 Hello Steve, I wanted to ask for your input in any possible workaround on using GigE cameras with Matlab/Simulink/Embedded Code, etc. We are trying to build our own camera using a TI dsp and Micron Imager. Any suggestion will be appreciated. Thank you in advance, -Sokol Hello Steve,

I wanted to ask for your input in any possible workaround on using GigE cameras with Matlab/Simulink/Embedded Code, etc. We are trying to build our own camera using a TI dsp and Micron Imager. Any suggestion will be appreciated.

Thank you in advance,
-Sokol

]]> By: Steve http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/#comment-16991 Steve Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:22:11 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/#comment-16991 Walid—The Image Acquisition Toolbox does not support the GigE standard. It's something we're looking at. Walid—The Image Acquisition Toolbox does not support the GigE standard. It’s something we’re looking at.

]]> By: walid jerbi http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/#comment-16977 walid jerbi Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:59:06 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/#comment-16977 He Steve What's about Gigevision (Gigabit Ethernet camera communication) protocol? I have a line scan camera with this standard of communication and I want to use Mathlab image processing toolbox to process images “on line” that were grabbed from the camera. Thank you for your answer. He Steve
What’s about Gigevision (Gigabit Ethernet camera communication) protocol?
I have a line scan camera with this standard of communication and I want to use Mathlab image processing toolbox to process images “on line” that were grabbed from the camera.
Thank you for your answer.

]]> By: Sridharan Kamalakannan http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/#comment-7057 Sridharan Kamalakannan Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:48:24 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/#comment-7057 For me its Mission Impossible-3. The scene in which photos are taken from the mobile camera rotating 360 degrees around the bad man. Then its sent for processing in which the 3-d model is reconstructed and infact a hardware builds a real 3-d mask out of it. The hardware also paints the mask. This scene was so cool and it uses a very apt software-hardware integration of an image processing application. For me its Mission Impossible-3. The scene in which photos are taken from the mobile camera rotating 360 degrees around the bad man. Then its sent for processing in which the 3-d model is reconstructed and infact a hardware builds a real 3-d mask out of it. The hardware also paints the mask. This scene was so cool and it uses a very apt software-hardware integration of an image processing application.

]]> By: Steve http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/#comment-6887 Steve Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:16:07 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/#comment-6887 Thaon—I don't generally write custom M-files for people. Depending on exactly what you mean by "visible components," you might find the function <tt>bwlabel</tt> useful, or perhaps you could look at the <a href="http://www.mathworks.com/products/image/demos.html" rel="nofollow">segmentation demos</a> for the Image Processing Toolbox. Thaon—I don’t generally write custom M-files for people. Depending on exactly what you mean by “visible components,” you might find the function bwlabel useful, or perhaps you could look at the segmentation demos for the Image Processing Toolbox.

]]> By: thaonphuong http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/#comment-6886 thaonphuong Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:44:48 +0000 http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2007/07/03/image-processing-in-the-movies/#comment-6886 i am in troubled with extracting /segmenting all visible components (visible subimages ) in an image. can you give me some M-files about that? thanks! i am in troubled with extracting /segmenting all visible components (visible subimages ) in an image.
can you give me some M-files about that?
thanks!

]]>