<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MTEST update, plus Help Browser integration info</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/03/19/mtest-update-plus-help-browser-integration-info/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/03/19/mtest-update-plus-help-browser-integration-info/</link>
	<description>Steve Eddins manages the Image &#38; Geospatial development team at The MathWorks and coauthored Digital Image Processing Using MATLAB. He writes here about image processing concepts, algorithm implementations, and MATLAB.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:55:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/03/19/mtest-update-plus-help-browser-integration-info/#comment-21584</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/03/19/mtest-update-plus-help-browser-integration-info/#comment-21584</guid>
		<description>James&#8212;That&#039;s a lot of changes to try all at once!  Test-driven development and object-oriented programming both take some getting used to.  Some programmers find that development pace actually speeds up with test-driven development, because the fraction of time spent debugging goes way down.  But that&#039;s only after you have some experience with the technique, and only if you get in the habit of making code changes in small, rapid increments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James&mdash;That&#8217;s a lot of changes to try all at once!  Test-driven development and object-oriented programming both take some getting used to.  Some programmers find that development pace actually speeds up with test-driven development, because the fraction of time spent debugging goes way down.  But that&#8217;s only after you have some experience with the technique, and only if you get in the habit of making code changes in small, rapid increments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Ong</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/03/19/mtest-update-plus-help-browser-integration-info/#comment-21583</link>
		<dc:creator>James Ong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/03/19/mtest-update-plus-help-browser-integration-info/#comment-21583</guid>
		<description>Ah, then I&#039;ll change my test functions to not use assertAlmostEqual any more.

By the way, your post on MTEST and refactoring made me read through the books &quot;Test-driven development&quot; (Beck) and &quot;Refactoring&quot; (Fowler) plus try programming MATLAB in an object oriented way. I&#039;m still assessing the advantages and disadvantages for my work, but the most obvious at the moment are:
- the code is more robust than I&#039;m used to
- the development time is somewhat slower than I&#039;m used to</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, then I&#8217;ll change my test functions to not use assertAlmostEqual any more.</p>
<p>By the way, your post on MTEST and refactoring made me read through the books &#8220;Test-driven development&#8221; (Beck) and &#8220;Refactoring&#8221; (Fowler) plus try programming MATLAB in an object oriented way. I&#8217;m still assessing the advantages and disadvantages for my work, but the most obvious at the moment are:<br />
- the code is more robust than I&#8217;m used to<br />
- the development time is somewhat slower than I&#8217;m used to</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/03/19/mtest-update-plus-help-browser-integration-info/#comment-21582</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/03/19/mtest-update-plus-help-browser-integration-info/#comment-21582</guid>
		<description>James&#8212;Yes, assertAlmostEqual has disappeared from the main documentation.  That was intentional.  The explanation is in the first paragraph of this post.  I have the new floating-point comparison functions assertElementsAlmostEqual and assertVectorsAlmostEqual.  I left assertAlmostEqual there to avoid making an incompatible change, but I would prefer that people use the new functions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James&mdash;Yes, assertAlmostEqual has disappeared from the main documentation.  That was intentional.  The explanation is in the first paragraph of this post.  I have the new floating-point comparison functions assertElementsAlmostEqual and assertVectorsAlmostEqual.  I left assertAlmostEqual there to avoid making an incompatible change, but I would prefer that people use the new functions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Ong</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/03/19/mtest-update-plus-help-browser-integration-info/#comment-21581</link>
		<dc:creator>James Ong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/03/19/mtest-update-plus-help-browser-integration-info/#comment-21581</guid>
		<description>Is is just me, or has AssertAlmostEqual disappeared from the main documentation of mtest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is is just me, or has AssertAlmostEqual disappeared from the main documentation of mtest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

