<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A new look for connected component labeling in R2009a &#8211; Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/</link>
	<description>Steve Eddins manages the Image &#38; Geospatial development team at The MathWorks and coauthored Digital Image Processing Using MATLAB. He writes here about image processing concepts, algorithm implementations, and MATLAB.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:27:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/#comment-24784</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/#comment-24784</guid>
		<description>Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Eddins</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/#comment-24780</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Eddins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 21:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/#comment-24780</guid>
		<description>Nick&#8212;bwselect might be useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick&mdash;bwselect might be useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/#comment-24779</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/#comment-24779</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve,

I am attempting to find the area of a small structure in a thresholded image, and I was hoping to use the connected component labeling properties of &#124;bwconncomp&#124; to do so. Is there a way to feed in coordinates (likely specified with &#124;ginput&#124;) and ask &#124;bwconncomp&#124; to only focus on that particular region?

I would essentially like to do the reverse of the example provided in the &#124;bwlabel&#124; documentation:


[r, c] = find(bwlabel(BW)==2)


that is, to specify the coordinates and only label that region.

I see that functions like &#124;regionprops&#124; and &#124;bwconncomp&#124; work on the entire image, and I wonder if there is a more sophisticated way to only focus on a certain region than to create a duplicate image cropped to the region of interest in the background.

Thanks for your help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve,</p>
<p>I am attempting to find the area of a small structure in a thresholded image, and I was hoping to use the connected component labeling properties of |bwconncomp| to do so. Is there a way to feed in coordinates (likely specified with |ginput|) and ask |bwconncomp| to only focus on that particular region?</p>
<p>I would essentially like to do the reverse of the example provided in the |bwlabel| documentation:</p>
<p>[r, c] = find(bwlabel(BW)==2)</p>
<p>that is, to specify the coordinates and only label that region.</p>
<p>I see that functions like |regionprops| and |bwconncomp| work on the entire image, and I wonder if there is a more sophisticated way to only focus on a certain region than to create a duplicate image cropped to the region of interest in the background.</p>
<p>Thanks for your help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/#comment-24523</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/#comment-24523</guid>
		<description>Shilan&#8212;Try this:

&lt;pre class=&quot;code&quot;&gt;
s = regionprops(bw, &#039;area&#039;, &#039;centroid&#039;);
a = [s.Area];
s = s(a &gt; 100);
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shilan&mdash;Try this:</p>
<pre class="code">
s = regionprops(bw, 'area', 'centroid');
a = [s.Area];
s = s(a > 100);
</pre>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shilan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/#comment-24503</link>
		<dc:creator>shilan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/#comment-24503</guid>
		<description>using &quot;bwconncomp&quot; function, I want to determine centeroid of regions with a size greater than for example 100! how is it possible to combine this function with something like find? Just in a way, for instance we use
&lt;pre&gt;
[r, c] = find(bwlabel(BW)==2)
&lt;/pre&gt;
or there is another way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>using &#8220;bwconncomp&#8221; function, I want to determine centeroid of regions with a size greater than for example 100! how is it possible to combine this function with something like find? Just in a way, for instance we use</p>
<pre>
[r, c] = find(bwlabel(BW)==2)
</pre>
<p>or there is another way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/#comment-23826</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 13:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/#comment-23826</guid>
		<description>Ramesh&#8212;regionprops on a 256-by-256 test image containing 88 connected components runs in 10 ms on my computer. Do you regard this as very very slow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ramesh&mdash;regionprops on a 256-by-256 test image containing 88 connected components runs in 10 ms on my computer. Do you regard this as very very slow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramesh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/#comment-23824</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 06:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/#comment-23824</guid>
		<description>Steve,

Regionprops runs very very slowly when I use it as a part of a code wherein I need to do labelling (of regions) on a set of images. I use Matlab v7.8.0 R2009a

Any tips on how to speed it up?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>Regionprops runs very very slowly when I use it as a part of a code wherein I need to do labelling (of regions) on a set of images. I use Matlab v7.8.0 R2009a</p>
<p>Any tips on how to speed it up?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/#comment-23615</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/#comment-23615</guid>
		<description>Tanya&#8212;I recommend reinstalling. If that doesn&#039;t work then I recommend contacting tech support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tanya&mdash;I recommend reinstalling. If that doesn&#8217;t work then I recommend contacting tech support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanya</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/#comment-23614</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/#comment-23614</guid>
		<description>Steve- I am currently running R2010a with the Image Processing Toolbox that came with it installed (Academic license).  Should I try re-installing everything, or contact tech support to help, or ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve- I am currently running R2010a with the Image Processing Toolbox that came with it installed (Academic license).  Should I try re-installing everything, or contact tech support to help, or ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/#comment-23613</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/07/13/a-new-look-for-connected-component-labeling-in-r2009a-part-2/#comment-23613</guid>
		<description>Tanya&#8212;You do not have a valid installation of Image Processing Toolbox for the platform you are running MATLAB on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tanya&mdash;You do not have a valid installation of Image Processing Toolbox for the platform you are running MATLAB on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

