<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knuth on go to &#8211; 1974</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/08/27/knuth-on-go-to-1974/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/08/27/knuth-on-go-to-1974/</link>
	<description>Steve Eddins manages the Image &#38; Geospatial development team at The MathWorks and coauthored Digital Image Processing Using MATLAB. He writes here about image processing concepts, algorithm implementations, and MATLAB.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:55:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/08/27/knuth-on-go-to-1974/#comment-22094</link>
		<dc:creator>kaian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 14:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/08/27/knuth-on-go-to-1974/#comment-22094</guid>
		<description>Steve: nice post!

Kanske: Steve is right. I&#039;d like to point you to MJD&#039;s blog, it&#039;s full of very carefully written, knowledgable, highly opiniated, superbly great reads. &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.plover.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blog.plover.com&lt;/a&gt;, try http://blog.plover.com/prog/design-patterns.html for a start.

cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve: nice post!</p>
<p>Kanske: Steve is right. I&#8217;d like to point you to MJD&#8217;s blog, it&#8217;s full of very carefully written, knowledgable, highly opiniated, superbly great reads. <a href="http://blog.plover.com" rel="nofollow">http://blog.plover.com</a>, try <a href="http://blog.plover.com/prog/design-patterns.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.plover.com/prog/design-patterns.html</a> for a start.</p>
<p>cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/08/27/knuth-on-go-to-1974/#comment-22081</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/08/27/knuth-on-go-to-1974/#comment-22081</guid>
		<description>Kanske&#8212;I think you are missing some historical context behind the paper and so are kind of getting it backwards.  At the time this paper was written (35 years ago!) the discussion was about replacing the use of goto&#039;s with structured loops, if-statements, etc.  Programming constructs that we take for granted today, such as while-loops, were still fairly new at the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kanske&mdash;I think you are missing some historical context behind the paper and so are kind of getting it backwards.  At the time this paper was written (35 years ago!) the discussion was about replacing the use of goto&#8217;s with structured loops, if-statements, etc.  Programming constructs that we take for granted today, such as while-loops, were still fairly new at the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kanske</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/08/27/knuth-on-go-to-1974/#comment-22075</link>
		<dc:creator>Kanske</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2009/08/27/knuth-on-go-to-1974/#comment-22075</guid>
		<description>What is the big difference between goto structuring and functions? As I see it, they are very similar in the way they operate.

When I write subfunction() in the middel of my code, the interpreter jumps to the label(function definition) and continues, until it reaches the end, and jumps back to the original point of execution. The only real difference is that function calls and definitions are a bit more structured than goto statements, and ofcause allow scoping of variables.

I can&#039;t easily come up with an example of code that could be written with goto, but not using subfunctions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the big difference between goto structuring and functions? As I see it, they are very similar in the way they operate.</p>
<p>When I write subfunction() in the middel of my code, the interpreter jumps to the label(function definition) and continues, until it reaches the end, and jumps back to the original point of execution. The only real difference is that function calls and definitions are a bit more structured than goto statements, and ofcause allow scoping of variables.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t easily come up with an example of code that could be written with goto, but not using subfunctions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

