Comments on: Feret Diameters and Antipodal Vertices
https://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2017/10/24/feret-diameters-and-antipodal-vertices/
Steve Eddins has developed MATLAB and image processing capabilities for MathWorks since 1993. He also coaches development teams on designing programming interfaces for engineers and scientists. Steve coauthored <i> Digital Image Processing Using MATLAB</i>.Thu, 02 Nov 2017 14:00:29 +0000hourly1https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7By: Steve Eddins
https://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2017/10/24/feret-diameters-and-antipodal-vertices/#comment-28878
Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:51:40 +0000http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/?p=2713#comment-28878Cris—Thanks for your input. You might be right. I haven’t had a chance to carefully profile and measure. Also, I enjoyed your 2012 post on this topic. I’ll probably link to it in my next post.
]]>By: Cris
https://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2017/10/24/feret-diameters-and-antipodal-vertices/#comment-28877
Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:26:01 +0000http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/?p=2713#comment-28877Steve, I like this topic!
I don’t think computing antipodal pairs is very expensive. You can actually compute distances while you enumerate them, and only store the max distance, not produce the list of antipodal pairs. I can’t imagine that being more expensive than the brute force computation. Well, maybe for 3 vertices? :)
]]>