NASA recently demonstrated a system called Safeguard, which disables a drone if it fails to respond to a warning and enters a designated no-fly zone. It can also impose altitude limits on drones. Mashable declared, “NASA’s drone killer does not play around,” describing how the system can enforce no-fly zones of any size or shape, forcing drones to drop from the sky if they proceed towards a no-fly zone.
Image Credit: NASA.
Safeguard uses a small piece of hardware attached to the drone, to both monitor the drone’s location and to potentially take over the drone’s controls if the drone approaches a restricted area. The system has two zones, or levels of warnings, before the drone reaches the restricted space. The first zone is a “containment boundary”, where the drone is sent a signal instructing it to take corrective action. If the drone, or the drone’s autopilot, does not correct its course and continues into the second zone, the drone is disabled and forced to land. This is the “terminate” zone. The two zones are shown in the image below, with yellow being the containment zone, and red being the terminate zone.
Drones (and drone operators) have made the news for operating in prohibited areas. From dropping phones and drugs to prisoners to interfering with firefighting efforts. US lawmakers recently proposed mandatory geofencing to restrict airspace for drone flight, both hobbyist and commercial.
Commercial drone companies, such as DJI, have added GPS-based geofence systems to their drones. The no-fly zones are programmed into the drones’ geofence system, first warning operators if they approach a geofenced area, then restricting flight if the drone proceeds into a restricted zone. Geofencing helps reduce the threat of accidental dangerous drone encounters or malicious attacks. But it is highly reliant on GPS availability and uncertified autopilot technology.
Safeguard takes geofencing one step further. It can be used on both fixed-wing and multi-rotor drones. Safeguard overcomes three common technical challenges of typical geofencing:
- Strict dependence on GPS
- Reliance on non-secure communication channels
- The use of uncertified autopilot technology
According to NASA, “What makes this technology different from existing geofencing systems is that the safety net is built on rigorous mathematics and works independently from the onboard autopilot.” It also overcomes the reliance on GPS, which is prone to signal loss.
“The algorithms for establishing the validity of a boundary and for detecting proximity to all defined boundaries are based on rigorous mathematical models that have been formally verified,” stated NASA. “To support the creation of highly-assured algorithms, the boundary detection and violation recognition functions embedded within the Safeguard code have been developed and verified using formal methods… In addition, Monte Carlo evaluations were conducted in MATLAB to provide evidence of proper functionality of the boundary detection and violation algorithms.”
Image Credit: NASA.
Steer clear of no-fly zones
Safeguard lists cargo delivery, surveillance and monitoring, infrastructure inspection, and agriculture as potential applications, but most drone operators have nothing to worry about. Safeguard is only for designated no-fly zones such as airports, stadiums, military bases, and other secure locations. These areas are typically full of warning signs and no place for drones to be buzzing around in the first place.
Safeguard is small enough to be mounted on any drone. While it’s not required on drones now, it could be required for certain types of drones in the future. For drone operators that are still enraged at the thought of technology disabling their drone mid-flight, this technology is far gentler than the laser technology used to shoot down drones. Boeing’s Compact Laser Weapon System, debuted in 2015, directs a high-energy beam to the drone which causes the drone to burst into flames.
コメントを残すには、ここ をクリックして MathWorks アカウントにサインインするか新しい MathWorks アカウントを作成します。