# Exploring shortest paths – part 1 9

Posted by **Steve Eddins**,

Blog reader Bogdan asked this question last week:

*I am trying to find the length and location of the shortest path between objects. It seems like some application of bwdist
should be able to do this. Any advice? Example:*

1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1

*Should yield*

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

*With p = path length = 1*

I agree, some application of `bwdist` should do it. Actually, there are several other useful functions that can be applied to this task, including `imregionalmin` and `bwdistgeodesic`, a new function that just shipped in R2011b.

I've been tinkering with this problem off and on for a few days, and I think it might take a few posts to explore some of
the interesting ideas and issues posed by this problem. Today I'll start with the basics of using `bwdist` and `imregionalmin` to identify a set of shortest paths from one object to another.

Let's use this simple test image to start our exploration.

```
bw = [ ...
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ]
```

bw = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

We want to find the shortest path (or paths!) from the upper left block of foreground pixels to the lower right block. The key algorithmic idea is this:

- Compute the distance transform for just the upper left block of foreground pixels.
- Compute the distance transform for just the lower right block of foreground pixels.
- Add the two distance transforms together.
- The pixels in the regional minimum of the result lie along one or more of the shortest paths from one block to the other.

(For reference, see P. Soille, Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications, 2nd edition, Springer, 2003, section 7.3.4, "Application to minimal path detection," pp. 233-234.)

But we can't use the normal Euclidean distance transform because it doesn't correspond to a path traversal from one pixel
center to another. Rather, we have to use one of the distance transform approximations supported by `bwdist`: `'chessboard'`, `'cityblock'`, and `'quasi-euclidean'`.

Here's how to do it using `'quasi-euclidean'`.

bw1 = [ ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ]; bw2 = [ ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ]; D1 = bwdist(bw1, 'quasi-euclidean'); D2 = bwdist(bw2, 'quasi-euclidean'); D_sum = D1 + D2; D_sum(3:5, 3:10)

ans = 7.8284 7.8284 7.8284 7.8284 7.8284 7.8284 8.4142 9.0000 8.4142 7.8284 7.8284 7.8284 7.8284 7.8284 7.8284 8.4142 9.0000 8.4142 7.8284 7.8284 7.8284 7.8284 7.8284 7.8284

You can see that the smallest value of `D_sum` is about 7.8284, and there's a set of pixels in-between the two objects that all have that value. The function `imregionalmin` identifies them all:

path_pixels = imregionalmin(D_sum)

path_pixels = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

In the quasi-euclidean approximation to the distance transform, the distance from a pixel to one of its horizontal or vertical neighbors is 1, and the distance from a pixel to one of its diagonal neighbors is sqrt(2). The result above says that the shortest such path between the two objects is 7.8284. Furthermore, it says that there is more than one shortest path.

I plan to explore this topic more fully this month. When using the quasi-euclidean distance transform, for example, there
are floating-point round-off issues that have to be dealt with when you try to apply the technique above to larger images.
Another issue is the effect of using different path-based distance transform approximations, such as `'cityblock'` or `'chessboard'`. Yet another issue is how to identify specific paths from the family of paths identified by `imregionalmin`. Along the way I'll experiment with different ways to visualize the results.

Finally, I'll explore how to use a new function, `bwdistgeodesic`, to find shortest paths when there are constraints on where the paths can go.

#### All the posts in this series

- the basic idea of finding shortest paths by adding two distance transforms together (part 1)
- the nonuniqueness of the shortest paths (part 2)
- handling floating-point round-off effects (part 3)
- using thinning to pick out a single path (part 4)
- using
`bwdistgeodesic`to find shortest paths subject to constraint (part 5)

Get the MATLAB code

Published with MATLAB® 7.13

### Note

Comments are closed.

## 9 CommentsOldest to Newest

**1**of 9

Hi,

Thanks for the example and explanation.

I guess bwdist will be helpful for my problem too.

I have a binary image which contains one pixel width skeleton of an image. I have got the skeleton using the bwmorph function.

As you may know basically in this binary image, I have ones on the skeleton and zeros anywhere else. how can I find the shortest ‘quasi-euclidean’ distance between two nonzero elements which are on the skeleton?

The path should be on the skeleton itself too.

I will really appreciate any help.

Thanks,

**2**of 9

It will be interesting to see your explanation of the new bwdistgeodesic() function. In the past I’ve solved this problem with dynamic programming (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_programming#Checkerboard) but it’s tricky and if you had a one-liner function call, that would be great.

Dynamic programming offers the ability to define a cost function so that the path cost depends on the gray levels of the image under the path, so for example you could use it to find the bright path or dark path along a blood vessel in a radiograph. It’s not simply and strictly distance-based but weighted by the underlying pixel values.

**3**of 9

Mark—Sounds like the new function graydist may be of interest to you.

**4**of 9

Sepideh—I will explore this idea in a later post. If you want to try to figure it out in the meantime, take a look at bwdistgeodesic.

**5**of 9

You could try converting the 2D image to a mesh, represented as a sparse matrix, and then use matrix-vector multiply to do a breadth-first search. I use that to compute the Bacon-number for the IMDB graph: http://www.cise.ufl.edu/research/sparse/matrices/Pajek/IMDB.html , which computes the shortest path from Kevin Bacon to all other actors in the graph. I’m not sure how the pixel values themselves would be accounted for, though. Jeremy Kepner and John Gilbert have a new book out on linear algebra used for graph computations that would be well worth a look. The book’s at my office and I’m at home, but I think they look at the shortest path problem, if I remember.

**6**of 9

Tim—Thanks for the book suggestion.

**7**of 9

Ok then i have two questions:

First thing: what if i am interested only in the *availability* of a path from a row of a matrix to a different row (i don’t mind the distance), do you have any suggestions for a low cost algorithm?

And secondly how could i allow movement that isn’t only up/down/left/right, lets say for example i wish to be able to move on one of the diagonals, (to the upper left neighbor and lower right one, and not the two other diagonal options)

**8**of 9

Uri—I posted one possible technique today.

**9**of 9

Uri— I just posted another possible technique.

## Recent Comments