# Visualizing Facebook Networks with MATLAB 4

Posted by **Loren Shure**,

When one of my guest bloggers, Toshi posted, Can We Predict a Breakup? Social Network Analysis with MATLAB, he got several questions about the new graph and network algorithms capabilities in MATLAB introduced in R2015b. He would like to do a follow-up post to address some of those questions.

### Contents

#### Questions from the Readers

In the comment section of my recent post about social network analysis, QC asked if there was any way to plot very large scale network (>10000 nodes) with uniform degree, and Christine Tobler kindly provided an example and a link to a dataset collection. I would like to build on her comment in this post.

#### Plotting Large Scale Network in MATLAB

Can MATLAB plot large scale network with more than 10,000 nodes? Let's start by reproducing Christine's example that plots a graph with 10,443 nodes and 20,650 edges, representing an L-shaped grid.

n = 120; A = delsq(numgrid('L',n)); G = graph(A,'OmitSelfLoops'); plot(G) title('A graph with 10,443 nodes and 20,650 edges')

#### Facebook Ego Network Dataset

For datasets, Christine suggested the Stanford Large Network Dataset Collection. I decided to take her up on her suggestion using its Facebook dataset. This dataset contains anonymized personal networks of connections between friends of survey participants. Such personal networks represent friendships of a focal node, known as "ego" node, and such networks are therefore called "ego" networks.

Let's download "facebook.tar.gz" and extract its content into a "facebook" directory in the current folder. Each file starts with a node id and ends with suffix like ".circle", or ".edges". Those are ids of the "ego" nodes. We can run `loadFBdata.m` to load data from those files. I will just reload the preprocessed data.

clearvars % clear workspace % loadFBdata % run script load facebook % or load mat file who

Your variables are: circles egofeat feat graphs edges egoids featnames

#### Visualize Combined Ego Networks

Let's first combine all 10 ego networks into a `graph` and visualize them in a single `plot`. This combined network has a little fewer than 4,000 nodes but with over 84,000 edges. It also includes some ego nodes, which means those survey participants were not entirely unrelated to one another.

comb = vertcat(edges{:}); % combine edges comb = sort(comb, 2); % sort edge order comb = unique(comb,'rows'); % remove duplicates comb = comb + 1; % convert to 1-indexing combG = graph(comb(:,1),comb(:,2)); % create undirected graph notConnected = find(degree(combG) == 0); % find unconnected nodes combG = rmnode(combG, notConnected); % remove them edgeC = [.7 .7 .7]; % gray color figure H = plot(combG,'MarkerSize',1,'EdgeColor',edgeC, ...% plot graph 'EdgeAlpha',0.3); title('Combined Ego Networks') % add title text(17,13,sprintf('Total %d nodes', ... % add node metric numnodes(combG))) text(17,12,sprintf('Total %d edges', ... % add edge metric numedges(combG))) text(17,11,'Ego nodes shown in red') % add edge metric egos = intersect(egoids + 1, unique(comb)); % find egos in the graph highlight(H,egos,'NodeColor','r','MarkerSize',3) % highlight them in red

#### Visualize a Single Ego Network - Degree Centrality

One of the most basic analyses you can perform on a network is link analysis. Let's figure out who are the most well connected in this graph. To make it easy to see, we can change the color by number of connections, also known as degree, and therefore this is a metric known as degree centrality. The top 3 nodes by degree are highlighted in the plot and they all belong to the same cluster. They are very closely connected friends!

Please note that the ego node is not included in this analysis as readme-Ego.txt says:

The 'ego' node does not appear (in the edge list), but it is assumed that they follow every node id that appears in this file.

By nature the ego node will always be the top node, so there is no point including it.

idx = 2; % pick an ego node egonode = num2str(egoids(idx)); % ego node name as string G = graphs{idx}; % get its graph deg = degree(G); % get node degrees notConnected = find(deg < 2); % weakly connected nodes deg(notConnected) = []; % drop them from deg G = rmnode(G, notConnected); % drop them from graph [~, ranking] = sort(deg,'descend'); % get ranking by degree top3 = G.Nodes.Name(ranking(1:3)); % get top 3 node names figure colormap cool % set color map H = plot(G,'MarkerSize',log(deg), ... % node size in log scale 'NodeCData',deg,... % node color by degree 'EdgeColor',edgeC,'EdgeAlpha',0.3); labelnode(H,top3,{'#1','#2','#3'}); % label top 3 nodes title({sprintf('Ego Network of Node %d', ... % add title egoids(idx)); 'colored by Degree Centrality'}) text(-1,-3,['top 3 nodes: ',strjoin(top3)]) % annotate H = colorbar; % add colorbar ylabel(H, 'degrees') % add metric as ylabel

#### Ego Network Degree Distribution

Let's check out the histogram of degrees between the ego network we just looked and the combined ego networks. People active on Facebook will have more edges than those not, but a few people have a large number of degrees and the majority have small number of degrees, and difference is large and looks exponential.

figure histogram(degree(combG)) % plot histogram hold on % don't overwrite histogram(degree(G)) % overlay histogram hold off % restore default xlabel('Degrees') % add x axis label ylabel('Number of Nodes') % add y axis label title('Degree Distribution') % add title legend('The Combined Ego Networks', ... % add legend sprintf('Ego Network of Node %d',egoids(idx))) text(150,700,'Median Degrees') % annotate text(160,650,sprintf('* Node %d: %d', ... % annotate egoids(idx),median(degree(G)))); text(160,600,sprintf('* Combo : %d', ... % annotate median(degree(combG))));

You'll notice that median degrees seem a bit small. That's because those are from nodes included in ego networks that contain nodes that are connected to ego nodes only. So we don't see other nodes that are not connected to the ego nodes (friends of friends). If you count the number of nodes in each ego network, you can see the degrees of each ego node, because ego nodes are supposed to be connected to all other nodes in their respective ego networks. The median is now 1404. Is this larger or smaller than the number of your Facebook friends?

deg = cellfun(@(x) numnodes(x), graphs); % degrees of all graphs median_deg = median(deg) % median degrees

median_deg = 1404

#### Shortest Paths

We looked at degrees as a metric to evaluate nodes, and it makes sense - the more friends a node has, the better connected it is. Another common metric is shortest paths. While degrees measure direct connections only, shortest paths consider how many hops at mininum you need to make to traverse from one node to another. Let's look at an example of the shortest path between the top node 1888 and another node 483.

[path, d] = shortestpath(G,top3{1},'483'); % get shortest path figure H = plot(G,'MarkerSize',1,'EdgeColor',edgeC); % plot graph highlight(H,path,'NodeColor','r', ... % highlight path 'MarkerSize',3,'EdgeColor','r','LineWidth',2) labelnode(H,path, [{'Top node'} path(2:end)]) % label nodes title('Shortest Path between Top Node and Node 483')% add title text(1,-3,sprintf('Distance: %d hops',d)) % annotate

#### Closeness Centrality

Distances measured by shortest paths can be used to compute closeness centrality, as defined in Wikipedia. Let's reload the pre-computed `distances` using the `spdist` function I wrote. Those with high closeness scores are the ones you want to start with when you want to spread news through your ego network.

load dist closeness = 1./sum(dist); % compute closeness [~, ranking] = sort(closeness, 'descend'); % get ranking by closeness top3 = G.Nodes.Name(ranking(1:3)); % get top 3 node names figure colormap cool % set color map H = plot(G,'MarkerSize',closeness*10000, ... % node size by closeness 'NodeCData',closeness,... % node color by closeness 'EdgeColor',edgeC,'EdgeAlpha',0.3); labelnode(H,top3,{'#1','#2','#3'}); % label top 3 nodes title({sprintf('Ego Network of Node %d', ... % add title egoids(idx)); 'colored by Closeness Centrality'}) text(-1,-3,['top 3 nodes: ',strjoin(top3)]) % annotate H = colorbar; % add colorbar ylabel(H, 'closeness') % add metric as ylabel

#### Can You Use Your Own Facebook Data?

Hopefully this post has provided a sufficient basis for further exploration with the SNAP Collection dataset. You may also want to try this on your own data. Unfortunately, you can't analyze your own Facebook friends graph because Facebook discontinued this API service. You can, however, use apps like Netvizz to extract a "page like network", which represents Facebook pages connected through likes. Here is the plot that shows the network of Facebook pages connected to the MATLAB page through likes using a `pre-computed graph`. Because this is a directed graph, we will use in-degree as the metric. It means we only count when a page is liked by other pages, but not when it likes others.

load fbpagegraph % reload data deg = indegree(G); % get in-degrees [~,ranking] = sort(deg,'descend'); % rank by in-degrees top5 = G.Nodes.Name(ranking(1:5)); % get top 5 figure colormap cool % set colormap to cool H = plot(G,'MarkerSize',log(deg+2)*2, ... % log scale node size by in-degree 'NodeCData',deg, ... % color by in-degree 'EdgeColor',edgeC,'EdgeAlpha', 0.3); labelnode(H,'MATLAB','MATLAB') % highlight MATLAB labelnode(H,top5,{'Make: Magazine','NOAA','NWS','Maker Faire Rome','Maker Faire'}) H = colorbar; % add colorbar ylabel(H, 'in-degrees') % add metric title('Facebook Page Like Network Colored by In-Degree') text(-2.8,3.5,'a network of pages connected through likes (directed)') ann = {lab,top5}; % generate label text(pos(:,1),pos(:,2),strcat(ann{:})) % add annotations

#### Summary

We only scratched the surface with the SNAP Collection - just one ego network out of 10 for Facebook, and each comes with more anonymized meta data, such as eduction, hometown, etc. and you can figure out what binds those close-knit friends by analyzing common attributes. Furthermore, the SNAP Collection also includes datasets from other sources, sugh as Twitter and Google Plus. You can also use Netvizz to extract data on Facebook pages you liked. Play around with those datasets and let us know what you find!

Get the MATLAB code

Published with MATLAB® R2015b

**Category:**- Big Data,
- Data Science,
- Social Computing

### Note

Comments are closed.

## 4 CommentsOldest to Newest

**1**of 4

Thank you!! Fascinating! More of this please!

**2**of 4

Congratulations, well researched and explained.

Would it make sense hierarchically cluster according to the Fiedler vector (eigencentrality)?

Thank you

**3**of 4

Thanks, Dimitris,

In this post I focused on centrality of individual nodes, but you could certainly try hierarchical clustering with Fielder vector if your aim is clique discovery. Let us know how it goes and share your results.

**4**of 4

This is also possible if they offer SEO as part of their service.

Figure out what it is you need and want and from there shop around to see

what web hosts matches these expectations. The amount of space required by a website should

also be considered while choosing a web host.

## Recent Comments